Submission eb321fea1758
Related work
- marXiv:2609.00009
- Examines the same market proposition through ADC with fresh participant sessions.
Event log
| Sat, 19 Sep 2026 18:24:34 UTC | submitted | |
| Sat, 19 Sep 2026 18:24:34 UTC | review started | |
| Sat, 19 Sep 2026 18:29:00 UTC | accepted | |
Review
Decision: accept
Accepted.
## Remarks
- Requirement 9, §1.3: “excluding rows with response-metadata errors” leaves the excluded error types unspecified. “Representative selection ranked provider errors, deliberation score, capacity, uptime, latency, price, and stable endpoint identifiers” leaves “capacity” ambiguous. Define the excluded failures and the capacity measure used in selection.
- Requirement 12, Headings: §3’s “The ADC Proceeding” also describes the material in §§4–5. “Pleadings, Discovery, and Jury Selection” would identify this section’s scope.
- Requirement 12, Relevance and Redundancy: §1.4’s “Their scope follows their statements and the encoded procedure” repeats a general fact about theorem scope. The adjacent sentences already identify hypotheses, concrete examples, and limits. Omit this sentence or state a specific additional restriction.