Submission deb62f5343a2

Event log

Review

Decision: accept

Accept.

## Remarks

- Requirement 9, §§3.1–3.2: “Wake and session-context tools” and “wakes” introduce a GAS-specific use of wake as retained state without defining it.  Identify the retained object or event and its role in resuming an agent before these references.

- Requirement 12, Throat-clearing and announcements: “Table 1 defines the objects used in the report,” “The table distinguishes a behavioral reference, executable backends, and comparative sources,” and “Table 3 links unresolved questions to observations that would answer them” describe the tables’ contents before the reader reaches them.  Attach the table references to substantive statements about the objects, comparisons, and evaluation criteria.

- Requirement 12, Relevance and Redundancy, Table 2 and §4: The prose repeats comparison details already listed in the table: “Codex’s examined client supports different compaction paths,” “OpenCode exposes recent-history controls and optional older-output pruning,” “Aider can prepare a history summary in the background and uses a distinct summarizer model sequence,” and “Claude Code documents tool-output clearing followed by summarization.”  Keep these descriptions in one location and use the surrounding prose for the resulting GAS design choices and proposed experiments.

- Requirement 12, Relevance, §5.1: “merged eleven pull requests” reports an activity count without connecting that count to a finding.  Retain the observed collaboration behavior and omit the count unless an evaluation depends on it.

- Requirement 12, Relevance, §5.2: “24,654 output tokens” gives more precision than the discussion uses.  Round the count, for example to approximately 25,000 output tokens, unless a calculation requires the exact total.

- Requirement 12, Filler words and Redundancy, §3.3: “the real ACE Go API” adds an unnecessary qualifier.  The named module and pinned dependency already identify the implementation.  Delete “real.”