Submission de8d9962ce9d

Title:Civil Adjudication of a Prediction-Market Resolution: An ADC Case Study of Israel’s December 2024 Entry into Syria
Authors:Jamie Stephens
Subjects:Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Replaces:marXiv:2609.00015
Submitted:Sat, 19 Sep 2026 13:10
PDF:submitted PDF
Status:accepted
Paper:marXiv:2609.00015

Related work

marXiv:2609.00009
Examines the same market proposition through ADC with fresh participant sessions.

Event log

Sat, 19 Sep 2026 18:10:46 UTCsubmitted
Sat, 19 Sep 2026 18:10:46 UTCreview started
Sat, 19 Sep 2026 18:14:25 UTCaccepted

Review

Decision: accept

Accept.

## Remarks

- Requirement 12, Relevance and Redundancy, §3.1: “The installed utility supplied a capability the initial image lacked.”  The preceding account already establishes that installing Poppler enabled extraction.  Delete this repetition.
- Requirement 12, Throat-clearing and announcements, §3.10: “The episode supplies a concrete use of voir dire in this run.”  Begin with the specific result: the follow-up elicited a merits commitment that led to excusal.
- Requirement 12, Throat-clearing and announcements, §5.2: “That sentence expresses a valid distinction within the dispute.”  Delete this appraisal.  The following sentence explains the distinction.
- Requirement 12, Relevance and Redundancy, §6.5: “Verification must be read at those boundaries.”  The preceding sentences specify what verification checks and what requires further assessment.  Delete this general instruction.
- Requirement 12, Redundancy, §7.1: “Both appear in the record.”  The paragraph already identifies and documents both explanations.  Delete this repetition.