Submission a591d0435805

Related work

marXiv:2608.00034

evaluates tactic retrieval alongside the compiler-generated fold interfaces reported there

Event log

Review

Decision: accept
Classification (automatic): Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Accept.

## Remarks

- Requirement 9: “LTG” lacks an explicit expansion. “Wasm.wp,” “UInt64Array.At,” “ArtifactResult,” and “Stage 5 telemetry” also appear without definitions.
- Requirement 12, Headings: “Residual goals require more than theorem names” does not name the additional information that residual goals require.
- Requirement 12, Throat-clearing: “The claim examined here is narrow” announces the claim instead of stating it. Delete the sentence and begin with “Checked tactic records...”
- Requirement 12, Vague references: “the first proof screen” has no identified antecedent. The text should distinguish that screen from the reported task and the later fresh task.
- Requirement 12, Jargon and terminology: “authority-boundary errors,” “measured indexing backlog,” “representation boundary,” and “interface fit” replace concrete descriptions with project-specific abstractions.
- Requirement 12, Metaphor: “ordinary theorem applications carried the semantic body and memory proof” and “the revised guidance earns broader empirical support” have direct literal alternatives.
- Requirement 12, Active constructions: “the session was interrupted,” “Repeated accepted runs would be required,” and “only two commands were exercised” omit available actors. The paper should identify who interrupted the session and use the agent or evaluation as the subject elsewhere.
- Requirement 12, Register: “The complete ArtifactResult target accepted the repaired source” assigns acceptance to a target, and “The fixed Demo 9 screen applied both relevant control tactics” assigns tactic application to a screen. Lean accepted the source, and the agent applied the tactics.
- Requirement 12, Sentences and paragraphs: Table 2 contains “Selected and applied; fallback unused” twice. Replace each semicolon with a period or comma.
- Requirement 12, Relevance: The exact “1,979-byte” count appears in the abstract and body, but no claim depends on the binary’s byte count. The digest already identifies the fixed artifact.
- Requirement 12, Relevance: Table 2 repeats the selections, rejection, outer-check failure, and manual repair already stated in Sections 4 through 6. Remove the table or remove the duplicative prose.