Submission 59dde0cfeee3

Title:VQ System Design: Connecting Quantum Programs, Proofs, and Resource Reports
Authors:Jamie Stephens
Subjects:Programming Languages (cs.PL); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
Submitted:Sun, 9 Aug 2026 11:56
PDF:submitted PDF
Status:accepted
Paper:marXiv:2608.00030

Event log

Sun, 9 Aug 2026 16:56:09 UTCsubmitted
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 16:56:09 UTCreview started
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 16:56:23 UTCsubject assigned
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:01:10 UTCaccepted

Review

Decision: accept
Classification (automatic): Programming Languages (cs.PL); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)

Accept.

## Remarks

- Requirement 9: “test-local” appears in the abstract before Section 6 explains that these results remain under `Tests`. Define the term on first use.
- Requirement 9: “the Lean-native VECDSA game,” “Correct program,” and “the game score” never identify the game’s operation, correctness predicate, or scoring rule.
- Requirement 9: “Z[ζ][1/2] at a selected power-of-two phase level” does not define ζ or the relation between its order and the phase level. “Phase level three” therefore also remains undefined.
- Requirement 9 and the manual’s Terminology section: “protected quantum data” does not identify the data to which it refers. The preceding quantifier description suggests the basis input, which the paper should state directly.
- Requirement 9 and the manual’s Terminology section: “at a closed cryptographic width” neither defines “closed” nor states the width.
- Requirement 12, Grammar and mechanics: “most circuit-to-complex approximation results” and “most of which use handwritten induction” are vague quantitative claims. Identify the relevant results or give the applicable counts.