Submission 22ebc45b02c0

Title:Verified Terrain-Following Flight Planning in LeanExe
Authors:Jamie Stephens
Subjects:Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Programming Languages (cs.PL)
Replaces:marXiv:2609.00019
Submitted:Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:01
PDF:submitted PDF
Status:accepted
Paper:marXiv:2609.00019

Event log

Sat, 26 Sep 2026 14:01:39 UTCsubmitted
Sat, 26 Sep 2026 14:01:39 UTCreview started
Sat, 26 Sep 2026 14:06:44 UTCaccepted

Review

Decision: accept

Accept.

## Remarks

- Requirement 12, Throat-clearing and announcements: The abstract says, “The report states the graph and physical-model assumptions, the distinction between generated-model verification and an exact-byte theorem, and the available execution evidence.”  State the verification limitation directly: the drone theorem concerns the generated model, and identifying the decoded binary with that model remains a separate proof obligation.
- Requirement 12, Throat-clearing and announcements: Section 2.2 says, “This report cites that record as evidence of the compiler’s current status.”  Attach citation [8] to the preceding sentence, which states what the record establishes, and delete this announcement.
- Requirement 12, Grammar and mechanics: Section 3.2 says, “The first and final state is zero.”  Write “The first and final states are zero” to describe the two endpoint assignments.
- Requirement 12, Metaphor: Section 7.2 says, “Separate preservation lemmas then carry the terrain through allocations and releases.”  State that the lemmas establish preservation of the terrain array during allocation and release.
- Requirement 12, Register and Metaphor: Section 8 says, “The report reads that theorem and its retained integration evidence without changing the drone checkout to the main compiler.”  Identify the evidence used and the verification performed.  For example: “The compiler account relies on the cited theorem source and retained integration evidence.  The report-specific builds used the drone checkout.”